THE STORY
Over the past year or so, I’ve been splitting my time
between looking for clients for my strategy consulting business and looking for
a full-time strategy job. This has given
me the opportunity to talk to a lot of executives at a number of companies.
In the vast majority of cases, I eventually received a
rejection. Now, one might at first think
that these rejections would make me feel more negative towards these
companies. After all, they rejected me.
However, just the opposite is true. After meeting with the people at these
companies, I like the companies a lot more.
I feel that I’ll be more likely to patronize them than before and I even
feel a bit more loyal to them—even though they rejected me.
Before I met with these companies, they were just faceless, impersonal businesses—just words and numbers. There wasn’t much of any reason to feel any personal connection with them. But after I met and talked with people in the business, that all changed. I got to see the people behind the company. I got to hear the passion in the voices of the leaders. I got to see people enthusiastically working at the company to do something great. I got to see the awards in the lobby display cases, hear the chatter in the lunch room.
In other words, the company was no longer a faceless,
impersonal entity. Now it was a real
living breathing entity with a personality.
I could feel the drive and the passion.
I could see there were people who cared.
Now I could relate to the business on a deeper, more personal level. The emotional bonds became stronger, because
now because there was a deeper connection.
Most businesses would be tickled to death if they could
create these deeper, more loyal ties with their customers. In my case, these great feelings continued in
spite of being rejected. Wouldn’t it be
great if customers had such strong feelings towards your business that it could
even overcome an occasional consumer disappointment?
In most businesses, it would not be practical to fly all of
one’s customers to headquarters to talk to senior leadership about the
business, like I was doing for interviews and business pitches. But anything a company can do to move from
being a faceless, impersonal entity to being a personality that customers can
relate to is a move in the right direction.
The principle here is that the personality of the brand or company matters. If done properly, it can help deepen the bonds between company and customers. If done improperly, it can create an image that will turn people away from the company. Therefore, as part of a strategic plan, one should consider the proper personality for the business and tactics for bringing it alive to the potential consumers. The personality needs to be managed, just like any other asset.
Example: Best Buy
I first realized the importance of this fact when I was
working at Best Buy. I was shown some
research Best Buy had done before my time there. I believe the research was from the early to
mid 1990s.
The research was asking customers their opinions of the various
consumer electronics retailers in the US.
At the time, there was a dozen or so regional retailers in this space
who wanted to become national leaders.
It included retailers such as Circuit City, Silo, Highland, Fretter’s,
Best Buy, and many others. Today, all of
them have long since disappeared—except for Best Buy.
Did Best Buy survive when others failed because consumers
saw it as a far superior consumer electronics retailer? This research at that time would say no. In fact, consumers saw all of these retailers
as pretty much the same. On all of the
rational variables of retailing (price, selection, etc.), all of the brands
were rated fairly equally. There wasn’t
much of any reason to prefer one retail brand over the other.
As I say in my book “The Most Important Question,” one of
the most important tasks of strategy is to discover and strengthen reasons for
customers to naturally prefer your company or brand more than the
alternatives. In this case, the consumer
electronics retailers were failing on this most important point. There was no reason to prefer a particular
store because they were seen as indistinguishable from each other.
That is, except for one little difference. At that time, Best Buy had a person who would
dress up in a costume which looked like a giant price tag. This walking price tag would interact with
customers in Best Buy’s advertising.
According to the survey, people liked this giant walking
price tag. Why? Because it helped give Best Buy a
personality. They liked the way it interacted
with the customers. It seemed to enjoy
the same fun, entertaining things they did.
It had a personality as being like one of them.
In a sea of faceless competition, the personality which came
from the giant Best Buy Tag gave customers deeper, more positive feelings
towards Best Buy than towards any of the competitors. It gave a reason to like Best Buy more, to
prefer it.
Now I’m not claiming that all of Best Buy’s success was due
to that giant price tag. Success comes
from doing a lot of things correctly. But
I do believe that the uniqueness of having a personality gave Best Buy an edge
at a critical time when industry consolidation was about to occur. It bought time in order for Best Buy to
improve a lot of other variables, so that Best Buy could be the superior brand
which survived the consolidation.
Without that personality edge, I am not sure Best Buy would have
survived the transition.
Lately, however, Best Buy’s future seems to be under threat. There are many reasons for that, and it will
take many changes to return strength to the Best Buy brand. But I am willing to bet that if you asked
consumers to describe the personality of Best Buy today, you would get a
lot of negative attributes.
Based on the chatter I read on the internet, Best Buy
appears to have lost control over managing that personality. It is being redefined by disgruntled customers
in a negative way. That is not a good
thing. Now Best Buy has to fight an
additional war. Not only does it need to
fix the problem of becoming irrelevant in a changing marketplace, it needs to
overcome a bad personality. It would
have been easier to transition to relevancy if it had the advantage of a
likeable personality on its side. Then
people would be more forgiving during the transition, just as I liked companies
even though they rejected me.
Suggestions
So how can we manage the personality for our benefit?
1.
First, think about personality strategically. Decide which personality is most in sync with
your strategic point of preference.
Figure out how to instill that personality into everything you do.
2.
Consider a more public profile for the leadership, so
that they can bring their face and personality to an otherwise faceless
firm. Richard Branson is a great example
of this. His strong personality is very
public and has helped give a strong personality to all of the Virgin divisions.
3.
In lieu of real employees, one can use symbolic
representations to make the personality come to life. This can be things as crazy as a giant price
tag, or the Geico Gekko.
4.
Actively manage your interactions with customers. Some lowly sales clerk on the front lines may
be the only human interaction a customer has with your firm. If that clerk has a bad personality, it can
reflect negatively on the entire brand, since it is the only human reference
point. Work to instill the proper
personality into all employees based on the way you hire, the way you train,
the way you reward. Zappos provides a
good example of this. They were so
intent on having a staff with the right personality that they only hire people
with the personality which fits their culture and mission. It a
huge part of the interview process. To
make sure employees are there for the mission and not just the money, after
someone has been employed for a week they offer them $2000 if they want to
leave. That weeds out the people who
only work for the money.
5.
Actively manage your interactions with society. Society expects businesses to be good
citizens. They want you to give
back. This is particularly true with the
younger adult generations. If you are
not seen as a good corporate citizen, it will damage your personality and you
will lose business.
6.
React quickly to threats to your personality. Monitor
what people are saying about you. As
soon as your personality is being threatened, act to rectify the
situation. Don’t let little issues grow
into big negatives. Be fast and
aggressive in protecting that reputation. Cisco is a company which takes this very
seriously and has developed tools to help others do the same.
Personalities help companies build stronger bonds with their
customers. These company/brand
personalities need to be managed like any other strategic asset. Incorporate personality
development/management/protection into your strategic planning.
Ask the marketplace this question: If my company were a person, what type of
personality would it have? You might be
shocked at what you hear.
The Strategic Business Development are very helpful to fulfil your business requirements. Thanks for sharing information about it. keep sharing..
ReplyDeleteBusiness Strategic Plan