THE STORY
I heard a great story long ago from a preacher. He was
describing a fishing club. Every week,
the club members gathered to hear lectures about how great it is to go fishing.
Everyone at the meeting agreed that fishing was great (and loved hearing
stories about fishing), but none of the members had ever actually gone fishing.
A new, younger member of the group listened to the lectures
and decided he would go fishing. So he did, and he caught a big fish. The
following week, he brought the fish to the weekly fishing club meeting. The
audience was excited. Most had never
seen a real fish before.
After that, the fishing club insisted that the young
fisherman repeatedly tell stories about his one fishing trip. Of course, this
kept the young man so busy that he could no longer find time to fish anymore.
So the fishing club was back to not having any members who fished.
The preacher was using his story to compare the weekly
fishing meeting to the weekly church service.
Many people at church are like the members of that fish club: They like to
hear stories every week about conversions to Christianity (catching fish), but
never go out to evangelize on their own. Many may not have ever even seen a new
convert to Christianity. His point was that just as odd as it would be to join
a fishing enthusiast’s club yet never fish, it should seem odd for a professing
Christian to love conversions but never participate in seeking them.
A similar analogy could be made in the business world. A lot
of business leaders profess to be enthusiastic about many great business
principles, like serving the customer, making employees the most important
asset, having a business strategy, and so on. They may talk about these great
business principles on a regular basis. The leaders may even convince their
followers to also believe in these principles.
But, if nobody in the company actually does anything to
support these principles, they become just hollow slogans with no impact. The
company becomes as silly as a fishing club that never goes fishing.
We are currently on the final blog in a three-part series on
the three characteristics which tend to determine whether a business is a
great, lasting winner, or a long-term loser. In the first blog, we looked at “Passion”
and saw that the winners have a passion for the business and the intricacies of
the business model which makes it work in the marketplace. The losers focus
their passion on the money that comes out of the business and are only
tangentially concerned about the details in how it is made.
In the second blog, we looked at “Direction” and saw that
losers choose a direction which follows—either the rules of the status quo or
the actions of the leader in the industry. By contrast, winners choose a
differentiating direction—either a new business model to better solve an old
problem, or an entirely new value equation for a new industry.
In this blog, we will look at “Action.” The principle here is that winners have a
bias towards taking action regarding what they believe. The losers, by
contrast, are more like that fishing club. They talk a good story, but never
get around to acting upon it.
It’s All About
Culture
A bias towards action tends to get to the root of a company’s
corporate culture. Some cultures naturally encourage action—a bias towards “yes.”
Other cultures have natural barriers which naturally discourage action—a bias
towards “no.”
A culture with a bias towards action tends to have the
following characteristics:
- Curiosity
- A Passion for Experimentation
- A Tolerance of Small Failures
- Willing to Take Calculated Risks
- Allow People Out in the Field Some Independence
- Permit “Skunk Works” (independent projects)
- Reduce the Red Tape to Get Things Done
- Get Tired of Just Talking and Settle Disagreements By Trying Something
- Put Their Investment Money Where Their Passions Lie.
Of course, if a company is all action with no direction, all
you have is confusion and anarchy. So what you want is action focused around a
general direction, the direction of strategic intent. You want to get those
things done which have the greatest impact on moving the strategy.
This is why all three characteristics of success tend to be
linked together. Without a passion for
how the business works, you won’t know what actions to take to improve it. Without
a strategic direction in how you want to stand out in the marketplace, you won’t
know where to experiment. It all goes together.
Three Types of
Actions
Successful companies tend to focus their actions in three
areas. First are the “tinkering” actions. This is the idea of never being content with
the status quo. The culture is one of never declaring “We’ve Made It!” The
thinking is that there is always room for improvement and we should try to find
ways to improvement all the time.
You can never just relax and put your feet up on the desk
and say we’ve perfected it and we can relax.
The problem with resting on your laurels is that the world is constantly
changing. The best for yesterday is not good enough for today. If you stop improving, a competitor will pass
you by.
Therefore, successful companies are always acting to tinker
with the current approach to make it better. They ask themselves questions
like:
- What Worked?
- What Didn’t Work?
- How Can We Do This Better/Faster/Cheaper?
- What is the Customer Feedback?
Wal-Mart is a master of the art of tinkering. They are never
content; always stretching to improve.
But it doesn’t stop there.
If all the action was on small incremental improvements, companies would
never make the major strategic leaps. Therefore, these successful companies
also devote a significant amount of time to bringing the future to life. I call
this “Big Picture” actions.
Think of Google. Their big picture vision is to advance the
consumption of knowledge in a superior manner for consumers, in a way that also
offers additional opportunities to leverage their digital advertising
strengths. But this is not mere talk. At Google, they do it.
To get more ads on mobile, Google created an entirely new
mobile ecosystem around the Android operating system. To get more ads related
to geographic search they invented a whole new approach to geographic search,
including sending cars everywhere to take street-level photographs of everything.
Google Glass allows people to see the internet all the time in glasses (that
will also support ads). Heck, they’ve even invented cars that drive themselves
so that passengers can be freed up to spend more time online to see Google’s
ads.
Google saw the big picture and made big actions over large sectors
in order to pave a path for their strategy. They didn’t wait for these markets
to evolve; Google created them themselves in order to control the destiny of
their strategy.
Similarly, Amazon wanted to protect its ability to continue
selling books once books went digital, so they acted to create the Kindle ebook
devices. They saw the big picture and did what was necessary to protect their
strategy. They weren’t talking about fish—they were fishing.
Finally, the third type of action revolves around just doing
the things that businesses should do. I call this “Doing What the Experts Say
to Do.” Starting with Peter Drucker and moving through the decades to today,
there have been a number of experts saying what good companies should do. It
involves things like:
- Finding a Position
- Investing In Your Infrastructure
- Investing In Your People
- Listening to Customers
- Communicating Well
- Delegating Properly
- Organizing Around Competencies
Good companies don’t just read about this stuff—they actually
do it. How many companies say they care about their people, yet do nothing to
show they care? The good companies make these principles come to life by
focusing actions to make it happen. We don’t need a lot more books on what
businesses should do. Instead, we need more business who make it a priority to
do what is in the books already written.
I remember going to a business roundtable of retail strategists
years ago. The mix of retailers represented covered the full spectrum—from very
successful firms to very unsuccessful firms. We started the meeting by going
around the table asking each strategist to say what was their biggest
challenge.
For the successful firms, there was a variety of high-level
problems that were being tackled.
However, for the troubled companies, the challenge was always the same.
They said their biggest challenge was in getting people to actually implement
the strategy. The losers could only talk about fishing; the winners were
actually doing it.
It could not be any plainer. If you can’t implement things,
you are doomed to failure. If you can, then the challenge is to pick which
successes to go after.
One of the key differences between business winners and
losers is the ability to turn ideas into actions. If your corporate culture has
a bias towards actions, you are more likely to succeed. The three types of
actions are:
1.
Tinkering—Always looking for ways to do things better
2.
Big Picture Actions—Building the future reality of your
grand strategy
3.
Doing What the Experts Say to Do—Putting the principles
of good business into action.
So success boils down to just three things—Passion for the Business
(and business model), Direction Towards Meaningful Differences, and a Bias
Towards Action. Where do you stand in these three areas?
No comments:
Post a Comment